LORENZOS OIL :: essays papers

LORENZOS OIL travail IVSTEPS 2 & 3Article 11. What is stead P? Increase in humour activity2. What is the sample? The 16 boys3. What is the population? All children4. What is the implicit question? Why is there a remainder in brain function between normal kids and kids with hyperkinetic syndrome.5. What is non the implicit question? Do all children get down a plaza p?6. What type of argument? Sampling7. what did they look at? They looked at 16 children who were diagnosed with ADHD cardinal were not.8. IQ Is there a difference in brain function between normal kids and kids with ADHD?9. non Do all children have a difference in brain function?SchematizationS1 6% of school children suffer from ADHD and call for medication.S2 They looked at 16 children between 8 and 13 who were diagnosed with ADHD six were not..S3 methylphenidate is the drug used to treat children with hyperactive and aggressive behavior.S4/C1 ADHD children react differently than normal kids when given RitalinS5 Children with ADHD show up problems like poor listening and poor impulse control..S6 Healthy children have a decrease in brain activity when given Ritalin.C2 Ritalin has no positive effect on behavior in robust childrenArticle 21. What type of argument? Correlation2. What is A ? GIK intervention (glucose insulin and potassium)3. What is B? Reduction in core attack deaths.4. Causal machine? Clogged arteries5. What is the implicit question? Why does oxygen nourishment (GIK)to the heart reduce heart attack deaths?6. NOT- What caused a reduction I tenderness attacks?7. Which rival explains why a and b occur together? forrader cause Rival - Those that received treatment did not have clotted arteries.The argument in the article is a correlation argument. There is a correlation between A the GIK treatment and B the reduction in heart attack deaths. The arguer believes there is a correlation because of a prior account. This study was originally conducted in 1960. And had showed and overall reduction in heart attack death rate by half. This study was cast aside however because of poorly conducted clinical tests. These tests led many doctors to doubt that it worked. The study conducted called GIK for glucose, insulin and potassium nourishes t65he heart muscle that are deprived of oxygen instantaneously following a heart attack. The causal mechanism are choke off arteries that reduce the flow of oxygen to the heart.